교통사고처리특례법위반등
Each public prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On March 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a Bknife vehicle at around 13:20 on March 1, 2015; (b) driven the said vehicle at a speed of about 80 km/h (Defendant’s statement) from the 369km point of the HJC at the ebbbbbbro frigs in the front of the vehicle in front of the same direction; (c) the driver of any motor vehicle at the front of the motor vehicle in front of the same direction has a duty of care to ensure a necessary distance to avoid collision with the motor vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the latter due to occupational negligence; and (d) the Defendant has a duty of care to repair the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the latter in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front.
2. Determination of each of the above facts charged is an offense falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and shall not be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning
However, since the victim submitted a written agreement to the effect that he does not want to punish the defendant after filing the prosecution of this case, each of the prosecution of this case is dismissed.