The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall pay KRW 138,813,612 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and KRW 88,213,612 among them. < Amended by Act No. 12571, May 2014>

Basic Facts

The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the arguments as a result of the request for physical examination of the head of the East Asia University Hospital. The following facts are: Gap's evidence 2, 4, 5, 6, Eul evidence 1 through 4 (including each number), 6, 8 through 13, and 16 evidence; the result of the request for examination of each of the medical records against the head of the High University of Korea, the head of the High University of the High School of the High School of the High School of the High School of the High School of the High Court;

The relevant Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is a juristic person that operates a main play hospital located in Jung-gu, Busan (hereinafter “Plaintiff hospital”) in 121, Jung-gu, Busan.

The defendant on May 25, 2011

6. 23. 23. Two times, a person who had been hospitalized in the Plaintiff Hospital and has been hospitalized in the Plaintiff Hospital from that time.

On May 24, 2011, the Defendant, from around April 2011, applied to the Plaintiff Hospital on the ground of scarcity pain, and the Plaintiff hospital diagnosed that the Defendant’s symptoms are unstable symptoms, and on May 25, 2011, the Plaintiff hospital conducted the scarcity arbitration on the ground that the Defendant’s symptoms fall under the Defendant’s symptoms unstable symptoms, and thereafter, on May 31, 201, the Defendant discharged the Plaintiff on May 31, 201.

On June 22, 2011, the Defendant saw a pain on the chest, and applied to the Plaintiff Hospital. On June 23, 2011, around 11:50, the Defendant received the instant procedure (hereinafter referred to as “instant procedure”).

On June 23, 2011, the defendant had been moved to a general bottle, around 18:40 on June 23, 201, and appealed for severe pains, including around 19:40, and on the following day, on June 24, 2011, the defendant appealed for the reduction of the angle of the bridge and the decrease of the exercise ability of both sides, and on June 24, 201, the plaintiff hospital conducted the brainRI inspection against the defendant around 07:10 on June 24, 2011.

Since June 24, 201, the Plaintiff hospital conducted a chest MRI test from around 10:47 to 11:20, and as a result, the Plaintiff hospital was 5 m3 and scarcity.