The defendant does not pay the above fine.

[208 High Court Decision 838] The defendant is a member of the clan B.

1. Around August 2004, the Defendant forged private document: (a) stated in the column of the applicant for the form of the application for permission of development activities within the area of “B from among Class B, E, F, and Address column” in the form of the application form for permission of development activities in the city of Jeonju, “B, E, F, and Address column”; (b) the location “in the column of the application form for permission: the answer, area: H, I, land category: the answer, area for use: general industrial area, general industrial area, area for use: 6,985 square meters; (c) the purpose of development activities; (d) the creation of a site for a stop site and the creation of a site for building materials: (e) August 204; and (e) affix the official seal of the name of the said clan, which the Defendant arbitrarily affixed to the name of the said clan attached to the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the application for permission to engage in the development activities in the name of the above Class B B, which is a private document related to rights and duties without authority, from that time to October 12, 2007, and forged a private document on the rights and duties in the name of the above Class B over 20 times in total as shown in the list of crimes Nos. 1 through 9, 11, and 21.

(2) On August 25, 2004, the Defendant’s display of the above investigation document is deemed to be a clear clerical error in light of the date of preparation in each document and the contents of the Defendant’s legal statement, even though there was an error that began from 19th to 18th. The date of preparation in each year was made on May 16, 2004 or May 20, 2004. However, in light of the date of preparation in each document and the Defendant’s legal statement, this is also deemed to be a clear clerical error.)

[Attachment 1655] 1.