However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the emergency department of C Hospital located in the Gu, Gowon-si, Changwon-si; (b) on April 12, 2016, the Defendant was a victim E (44 years old) who was working as the doctor of the family department of the above hospital, and was inside the hospital for the treatment of the Defendant’s leakage or D.

In order to photograph EXE, I first need to receive EXE.

on the ground that “I am this ar, I have to start treatment when I have been a patient,”

It is why much the words are used;

In doing so, “the victim was suffering from disturbance,” and continued to inflict an injury on the victim, such as impairment of the face that requires treatment for about 14 days, by putting the victim’s right-hand knife one hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the medical treatment of emergency patients, and at the same time inflicted injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographs of victims, medical certificates of injury, and emergency room service;

1. Article 60 (1) 1 and 12 of the Emergency Medical Service Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The sentencing criteria, as indicated in the instant records, are to be determined by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the extent of injury is relatively minor and the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. (the sentencing criteria do not provide a separate processing method for the ordinary concurrent crimes; and (b) the sentencing criteria do not apply to the ordinary concurrent crimes without presenting a separate processing method).