However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 28, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of 300,000 won for the crime of injury at the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) on September 28, 2009 with three times more records of violent crime.

The defendant and the victim B(37 tax years) are people who gather the Han River City located in the 5935-dong-dong-dong, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and have been employed as a daily worker at the second apartment construction site.

On March 8, 2016, while the Defendant was engaged in organizing pipes at the construction site above around 08:00, the Defendant expressed a bath to the victim for the reason that the victim did not turn on the front of the safety equipment and did not interfere with work, and the victim took an open room for the entry of approximately 2 weeks of the victim’s right entrance in drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a photograph of or injury to a victim;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances) are against the defendant, taking into account the fact that the defendant’s mistake is against the defendant, and that the damage is relatively minor, the punishment as set forth in the disposition shall be determined.