However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 30, 2016, around 13:15, the Defendant driven the Crane car that is not covered by mandatory insurance without obtaining a driver's license from approximately 200 meters near the 41-20-mix-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to vehicle accident inquiry, mandatory insurance inquiry, ledger of driver's licenses, and report on the circumstances of unauthorized driving;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 (Selection of Imprisonment) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 46 (2) and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act (Selection of Imprisonment)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act has been already punished several times, and in particular, on March 12, 2015, the Defendant was punished by a fine of one million won by driving the instant vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance with a license from the Seoul Central District Court on March 12, 2015, and on March 14, 2016, by committing the same act with the same vehicle at the same court on March 14, 2016, and was punished by a fine of three million won by committing the same act on March 15, 2016 after the issuance of the said summary order. On March 15, 2016, the Defendant committed the same act with the same vehicle with the same vehicle by an investigative agency on March 15, 2016 and was investigated by the said summary order on April 4, 2016.

I would like to say.

However, it is decided as ordered in consideration of all kinds of sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the defendant is in depth divided into crimes, the vehicle is scrapped, there is no record of punishment heavier than the fine for the same kind of crime, and the age of the defendant.