When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 22:50 on July 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a door on the front side of the Daejeon Seo-gu Bukdong, Daejeon; (b) obstructed the operation of the patrol car for about 10 minutes; (c) obstructed the Defendant’s act on the front side of the police officer D (ma, 34 years old); (d) obstructed the Defendant’s act on the front door of the police officer D, a police officer D (ma, 34 years old), who was called up upon having received a report, to stop the disturbance and return home; (e) her bath, and (e) took a bath to the Defendant; and (e) opened a door to the police officer D’s act on the front door of the police officer D, who continued to open the door.

The police officer D's left hand shots, which had been slided with the chief door of the close slid, was slided into the chief door of the police officer D.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Details of the report of 112 cases and opinions of doctors;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of damage, five times the fact that only a fine has been imposed by 2010, and the sentencing factors under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are considered.