2. The Defendants recognized their mistake and reflect, Defendant B did not have any record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, and there is old age to support the Defendant, Defendant C was a first offender with her husband and her child, etc. However, in light of the impact of the instant crime on society, in light of the fact that the instant crime is committed systematically and systematically and systematically, the crime of this case on multiple victims by committing so-called “ Bosping,” which is committed in a group of crimes. Defendant B did not withdraw cash, Defendant C did not have much nature of the crime; Defendant C did not withdraw cash; Defendant C did not recover most of the victims’ damage; Defendant C did not recover most of the victims’ damage; and all other sentencing factors in the instant pleadings including age, sex, environment, health condition, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime. In full view of all the sentencing factors in the instant pleadings, it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the lower court is too unfair.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.