except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 11, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jeonju District Court on November 11, 2009 and a fine of KRW 4 million for the same crime at the Jeonju District Court on September 9, 2013, and thus violated the provisions on the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol at least twice.

1. Around 00:40 on May 24, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and driven a car without a driver’s license within a section of about 700 meters of blood alcohol concentration of about 0.160% from the 700-meter radius to the front road located in C in the Hansan-si, Soon-si.

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition regulations on driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice and drives a vehicle under the influence of alcohol at the same time without a driver's license.

2. At around 00:40 on May 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) demanded to present a driver’s license to verify the status by police officers F of the Police Station E affiliated with the Dosan Police Station E, which was under traffic control in front of the Dosan City B on the roads located in B; (b) presented the G driver’s license under the name of the Commissioner of the Daejeon Police Agency, which was a public document having the former business relationship, as if the Defendant was the Defendant’s driver’

3. The Defendant, as described in paragraph (2), has signed “G” in the signature column of the driver’s opinion statement written by the Y of the Y Police Station Ethical police station, the Hasan Police Station, which was under the influence of drunk driving, with the intention of driving as G as if he were G using his driver’s license, and forged one copy of the report on the state driver’s circumstantial statement written in the name of G, which is a private document concerning the certification of facts, with the seal affixed thereon, at the time and place described in paragraph (2), and as described in paragraph (2). The Defendant, who is aware of such fact, was duly formed the report on the state driver’s circumstantial statement written in the foregoing.