2. Determination is a favorable condition that the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes and reflected his mistake, and that the Defendant’s health is not good due to depression, depression, etc.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims, in particular, the special injury to the victim D is an unfavorable circumstance, such as the fact that the victim living together with the defendant inflicted an injury on plastic head broom and knife, which is a dangerous object of the defendant's living together, and the degree of injury to the victim is not good, and the defendant has been punished several times including imprisonment for the same kind of crime, and the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime.

In full view of the above circumstances and the facts that there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered after the pronouncement of the lower judgment, all of the factors indicated in the arguments in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive for committing a crime, means and consequence of a crime, and the scope of recommended sentences based on the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court sentencing committee, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.