업무방해
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On December 3, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a stay of execution on two years and six months after he/she was sentenced to a stay of execution on December 11, 2015 by the Ulsan District Court on December 3, 2015.
【Criminal Facts】
On July 25, 2016, around 15:30 on July 25, 2016, the Defendant was driving in C-si in the vicinity of the New Sports Center in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, and was under the influence of alcohol, and did not get off the vehicle even after arrival of the destination, and the Defendant was leaving the vehicle to the taxi according to the E area located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.
At around 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) took an desire to get off the taxi from the victim and the police officers F, etc. belonging to the E zone; and (b) did not go off from the taxi and obstructed the victim’s operation of the taxi for about 20 minutes on the ground that it was difficult to fill the taxi.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B
1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;
1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are not somewhat harsh in that the defendant committed a crime without being able to do so during the period of suspension of execution as indicated in the judgment of the court. However, considering the fact that it appears that the defendant committed a crime in a state without having normal judgment ability under the influence of alcohol, it appears that the defendant committed a crime without being able to do so under the influence of alcohol, and that the victim was deprived of and compensated for damage, the degree of the exercise of tangible power is not considerably significant, and the degree of damage is not considerably significant, and it is determined that the invalidation of the suspension of execution, which is a criminal record, is somewhat harsh in light of these circumstances.