However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On August 6, 2014, at around 18:20, the Defendant driven a double-wing truck with approximately three kilometers from the frontway to the frontway of the police traffic center located in the same City/Do, from a plastic house workplace in the Naju-si, on August 6, 2014, under the influence of alcohol content of at least 0.065 percent of blood alcohol without a car driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entry in the register of driver's licenses;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Point of drinking under the judgment: Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act;

(b) Point of driving without obtaining a license: Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Abnormal concurrence and the choice of a punishment under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (the punishment prescribed for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) with heavier punishment, and the punishment prescribed for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) with heavier punishment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the blood alcohol concentration is not high);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 (1) and (2) of the Act on Probation, etc.;