When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person using the clinic called “C” in the Kafa B, which was established following the Internet evasion site, and the victim D is a person using the clinic called “E” in the above Kafa.

1. 피고인은 2013. 4. 25.경 위 카페에 “E님의 어처구니 없는 자작글의 정정된 내용입니다”라는 글이 게시되자 ‘E’이라는 닉네임을 사용하는 피해자를 지칭하며 “참남자가 왜이리쪼잔한지 같은남자로써 참.. 벙개에 여자 혼자만 고의로불러놓고 돈더쓰게하는꼬락서니가ㅠㅠ;;; 참찌질하네요 내가친벙개 노래방쏜다고한 벙개 다들노래방안가신다해서 그냥 3차쐈구만 아무튼 똥밟았다생각하고 앞으론 조심해서 사람을 만나세요”라는 댓글을 게시하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. 피고인은 2013. 4. 26.경 위 카페에 “E 전번아시는분 ”이라는 제목에 “저한테 전번좀주세요 설갈 때 한번 얼굴좀보게요 ㅎㅎㅎ 아놔 이 10장생같은 새끼가 어따대고 쪽지로욕하고 시비질이야 조용히사는사람한테 ㅎㅎㅎ 온라인으로 깝치다 오프라인으로 뒤지게맞는수가있다 ㅎㅎ”라는 글을 게시하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The following circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case as follows, which are acknowledged by the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, namely, a carpets group as indicated in the judgment.