When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. The Defendant is a real estate broker who operates D real estate in sealed time C.

On January 2016, the Defendant introduced and introduced E forest land to F when he / she was pushed down to purchase it.

Around March 28, 2016, Defendant D’s above real estate office of Defendant D, for the purpose of exercising the said F’s approval for the use of a house newly built on the said land, entered the content that H land is divided into H 567 square meters into H 546 square meters and 1346 square meters, without having been delegated or permitted by G with respect to the preparation of an application for land alteration with respect to H land 913 square meters adjacent to the said E’s land, in spite of the absence of delegation or permission, the Defendant: (a) stated that H land is divided into H 913 square meters into H 567 square meters and 9136 square meters; and (b) put the applicant into the name subsequent

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a written application for land alteration in the G name, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On March 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) submitted to the public official in charge of having knowledge of the fact that the application for land alteration in the false G name was completed, as in the above paragraph (1), at the civil petition office and office for viewing smuggling-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to applications for land alteration;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Provisional Payment Order, there are some circumstances to consider the fact that the use of the land as indicated in the judgment is forged and used without confirming G’s intention, and the land which was subdivided according to each of the crimes in the judgment below is re-written.