When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

A is a person who operates B for the purpose of removing structures.

On February 11, 2019, from around 08:30 to around 08:30, the Defendant cut and removed part of the cases inside the mountain mountain mountain mountain mountain mountain mountain mountain village Cdong from the E farm owned by the victim D (78 years of age, South) in the Gosi-gun of the former North Korea.

In such cases, due care has been paid to prevent the occurrence of fire in advance by taking fire prevention measures, such as completely extinguishing water at a place less than melting fire, after completing work to prevent the exposure fire that occurs in the course of the work of cutting oxygen, and after leaving the site, there has been a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of fire in advance.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 산소용접기로 케이지 절단 작업을 하던 중 점심시간이 되자 같은 날 12:08경 작업을 마치고 현장을 떠나면서 계사 바닥에 쌓인 닭의 배설물 등 주변 가연물에 남아 있는 불씨를 완전히 소화시키지 아니한 채 현장을 떠난 과실로 인하여 같은 날 12:10경 산소절단 시 튄 불티가 주변 가연물에 착화되어 시가 1억 원 상당의 연면적 760㎡ 강철 파이프조 철판지붕 구조 산란계사 1개동, 시가 3억3,000만원 상당의 케이지를 태우고, 시가 3,000만원 상당의 연면적 800㎡ 철골조 샌드위치 패널 지붕 구조 산란계사의 샌드위치 판넬 160㎡ 등을 그을려 도합 시가 4억 6,000만원 상당을 소훼하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report on the occurrence of a fire, on-site photographs, survey reports on the scene of a fire, and fire-proof results;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 171 and 170 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the background leading up to the occurrence of the case and the victim’s considerable money.