취득세등부과처분취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, except for adding a decision that it is difficult to view the apartment of this case as being directly used for the purpose of the Plaintiff’s business, which is an organization for religion purposes only because the apartment of this case is a multi-family housing under the Building Act, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.