정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who acts as “D” (E) in B carpet C.
On November 7, 2017, the defendant's office located in Ulsandong-gu F, Ulsan-gu, and the defendant's office "I wish to adopt a dog."
The facts are presumed to be the same object by posting a statement on the “H” on the bulletin board, despite that the victim G is not a business that sells the victim G’s strongness, the fact is presumed to be the same object by posting a statement on the “H” in the victim’s use.
At the risk of sale in lots other than this, it is difficult to say that they are sold in lots.
Although it is difficult to conduct a disguised visit on the family of the activity details, there is a need for doubt.
The proposal is considered to be the second month, and each week is involved in the sale of other lectures.
The main activity area shall be the same outline in Daegu.
Megly, members of the Kafa may be fluored and adopted. Mafaly, the State posted a false statement stating that if you look at each State, the Dogdog should have several Magnas. The next day, the Kafa posted the victim G's clinic on the Kafa bulletin board, and then posted the Kafags as the Kafa, and then posted the Kafags as the Bags of the victim's G, and then, the Kafags violated C Rule.
“Along with the purpose of slandering the victim by posting a false letter, the victim’s reputation was undermined by disclosing false information via an information and communications network.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement of the police statement related to G;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen after the closure of a course;
1. Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 of the relevant Act;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that even though the injured person wishess to punish the Defendant’s severe punishment, the Defendant is the primary offender, the instant notice does not contain abusive or insulting expressions, and the Defendant’s economic situation is not enough in her age.