However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 2, 2009, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on June 21, 2011, the Defendant was a person who was notified of a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court. On August 7, 2013, the Defendant driven a vehicle with approximately 100 meters away from the front side of the cost-based main point of the YU-dong located in the YU-dong in the YU-dong in the YU-dong in the YU-dong in the YU-si Office in the YU-si Office in the Yan City from the front side of the cost-based main point of view to approximately 03 parking lots.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of an entry report from an employer;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in which criminal records, investigation reports (former and current facts) and copies of summary orders attached thereto are recorded;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that he/she has no criminal records of imprisonment or heavier punishment);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 (1) and (2) of the Act on Probation, etc.;