A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 4,000,000 and by a fine of KRW 2,00,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

On June 4, 2015, from around 22:00 to the next 03:30 on June 4, 2015, the Defendants: (a) provided two copies of each one card using Trum card 312 and chip 289; and (b) carried out a hur and chip with each other by bringing about about 1,000 won to one chip.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the site and seized articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime: The main sentence of Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of punishment);

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The degree of the Defendants’ participation in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not seem to have been more severe than C and D, for whom a summary order of KRW 1 million was issued.

However, in consideration of the fact that the same criminal records are two times (one time of punishment, one time of suspension of execution), and that the defendant B had the same criminal records once (one time of punishment) and the same criminal records, and that the defendant B has the same criminal records, the punishment shall be determined like the order.