beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.10 2015노2797

업무방해

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is only the victim's oral dispute with the victim, and there is no fact that the victim has obstructed the victim's main business by entering the main points operated by the victim.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, such as the statement of the victim, etc., the defendant was duly admitted and examined. The defendant reported the defendant to the police as the day he left the front signboard of the victim's operation, and the victim was found as the main point of the victim's operation, and it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by avoiding disturbance with large sounds and preventing customers from drinking normally as stated in the judgment of the court below. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.