beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.05.02 2018고합226

현주건조물방화치사등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for twelve years.

One saw (No. 1) of seized pharmaceutical saw (65 cm in total length, 45 cm in blade).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) on September 23, 2018, in the operation E of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si B apartment C heading; (b) on September 23, 2018, knife F and knife B apartment C heading; and (c) thereafter, the Defendant was investigated by the police as the knife of the knife and the knife of the knife.

At around 19:50 on September 25, 2018, the Defendant sought to E, however, he listened to the horses from the proprietor D, the victim G, the victim H, etc., that “I have been in a restaurant, or has not been in a person,” and heard the bath theory from the victim G, the victim H, etc., which read “I have been in a restaurant, or has not been in a person.” B, after going to the outside of E, I discovered gasoline in the Defendant’s warehouse located about about 10 minutes, with approximately 4 litress of gasoline, and found it in E with a mind to flick.

On September 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 20:33, while moving with gasoline 4 liters, disposable gas bags, and newspapers, she was removed by the victim I, and the victimJ, and laid the gasoline e in the rear side of the building. On September 25, 2018, the Defendant went back to E again on September 20:45, 2018; (b) but (c) was hinging back from business owners D and customers G, victims H, etc., and was hing up and hinging up the bath, the Defendant was flued into the lower part of the E building, and ging the gasoline into the floor and ging the gasoline with a single gas gas engine, and ging the gasoline into the lower part of the E building, and stated “the e-mail and its adjacent part” as “the e-mail and its adjacent part” and “the e-mail and its adjacent part.”

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

The restaurant and M have been transferred to the restaurant.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed the “K” restaurant and the “M” restaurant operated by the “K” restaurant and the “M” restaurant operated by the P, which is used as a residence by D, etc., and thereby, was in E.