beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.02.21 2018나11657

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. We examine ex officio the legality of the subsequent appeal.

The court of first instance served a copy of the complaint on October 30, 2017 on the part of the defendant, who is the defendant's resident registration address, as Busan-gu C building and D (hereinafter "the address of this case"), and served the copy of the complaint of this case on the defendant's own. The court of first instance served the defendant as the address of this case and served the notice of the date for pleading to the defendant on January 8, 2018. The original copy of the judgment of first instance on the defendant's birth on February 4, 2018. The court of first instance served on the defendant as the address of this case and served the document on the defendant's birth. The defendant's resident registration record book transferred on July 1, 2013 to the defendant's address of this case, and the fact that the defendant submitted an appeal to the court of first instance on May 21, 2018 is clear.

As above, the service of a duplicate of the complaint of this case, notice of the date of pleading, and the original copy of the judgment of the court of first instance, at the Defendant’s resident registration address, is lawful, and there is no circumstance to deem that the service was lawful, and the period of appeal, which is a peremptory period, was not possible

Therefore, the appeal filed after the lapse of two weeks from the date of delivery of the original copy of the judgment of the first instance is unlawful.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is illegal to have been filed with the lapse of the appeal period.