2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant both recognizes the crime and reflects the fact that the defendant has committed the crime, that the defendant repaid 1.1 million won to the victim, and that part of the money acquired through deception seems to have been used as the source cost with the victim. However, although the sum of the money acquired through deception amounting to about 23 million won, there are no other damage recovery or agreement, the defendant did not reach an agreement, that there are several criminal records, such as the suspended sentence of imprisonment, one time of fine, two times of punishment due to the crime of larceny, imprisonment with prison labor, one time of the suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, one time of the suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, and one time of the suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, there are no special changes in circumstances to change the sentence of the court below after the sentence of the court below is sentenced, and the defendant's assertion cannot be accepted because it is too unreasonable since the sentence imposed by the court below is too inappropriate.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.