원상회복청구
1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The grounds for appeal by the Defendants cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are deemed legitimate even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance is added to the evidence
Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
3 The 5th parallel "Article 2" shall be raised to "Article 3".
Defendant B’s “Defendant B” of the 3rd parallel of Haak is turned into “Defendant B’s ownership”.
7 The testimony of witness E and M "B" for each testimony of the first instance court E, M, and witness V for the trial of the first instance.
7. The evidence submitted by the Defendants, such as the statements in the Evidence Nos. 4, 5, 6, and 13 and the testimony of witness V of the trial party, shall be sufficient to reverse the above recognition, and there shall be no reflective evidence otherwise."
8 The following shall be added between one parallel and two parallels:
“D) The Defendants asserted that the Defendants were not the actual owners of each of the instant land at the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract.
However, as seen earlier, at the time of the conclusion of the above sales contract, the Defendants were the registered titleholder of each land of this case. The Defendants’ above assertion is against Article 186 of the Civil Act and cannot be accepted in itself.
11 The term "950 million won" in the 8th parallel parallel shall be "950 million won".
2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendants' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.