손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "F" under Section 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "C"; "7,00,000,000" under Section 14 of the same Article as "Lease deposit 72,00,000"; "37,000,000,000" under Section 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance as "39,000,000"; and "39,000,000,000" shall be attached to the attached list of the judgment of the court of first instance as "39,00,000,000"; and as to the plaintiff's argument at the court of first instance, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition of "2. Additional
2. The Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages equivalent to the premium even in light of the legislative intent of Article 10-4 of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act and the principle of equity, even if the Defendant’s lease term expires, the Plaintiff did not directly make a lease to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s children were scheduled to operate a coffee shop several times, and even if the Plaintiff was a new lessee, it is apparent that the lessor would have refused to enter into the lease contract with the new lessee, and thus, the lessor could not arrange for the new lessee by suspending physical coloring.
According to the statement of No. 3, it is recognized that the defendant sent to the plaintiff a certificate of content that "if the commercial building of this case is named, it will be directly used by the person in question" around October 20, 2016.
However, it is difficult to readily conclude only with the above expression of intention that it would immediately refuse to enter into a lease agreement with the new lessee of the Plaintiff’s good faith. Furthermore, even if the Defendant expressed his intent to refuse to enter into a lease agreement with the new lessee, the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act lists only the act of interfering with the collection of premiums, as seen earlier, and all the types of the act are all.