A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year and two months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendants’ organization of telephone financing fraud (one name “Sscam”) consists of a braille organization and takes charge of communication between each constituent member of the organization, and falsely speaks that it would substitute the existing loans to an unspecified number of unspecified persons at a low interest to bring about cash to the account holder under the name of “col center staff”, “book for solicitation of accounts,” “measures to withdraw money if money is transferred to a designated account by the victims,” “measures to withdraw money if money is transferred to the designated account”, “measures to direct withdraw money by means of delivery of the card, etc. to be used in committing the crime to the solicitation book, or directly withdraw money from the victim by receiving the money from the victim or deliver money directly to the other withdrawal book by receiving the money from the victim, “transfer”, “transfer of deposited money” to the upper party in China, etc.

Defendant B and Defendant A conspired with many unspecified mobile phone subscribers in Korea by communicating with telephone and text messages, and misrepresenting their employees, such as financial institutions, the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., and “to grant loans at low interest,” and “to repay existing loans,” in sequence C intended to act as “delivering books.” Defendant B and Defendant A served as “an account solicitation book” and “an account transfer book”. Defendant B and Defendant A established a false legal entity without substantial substance under the direction of the non-indicted (the total account supply book), which is the corporate passbook.

On April 1, 2020, when it is difficult to know about 10:00, the light light employee sent a text message of advertisement to the mobile phone of the victim E in a place where it is not known, and the victim confirmed that the victim misrepresented the phone to the F Bank's counseling and pretended to provide loan counseling to the victim, thereby making the victim play a bad example to the mobile phone.