beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.10.25 2017고단445

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. - The Defendant is in possession, from February 2, 2017 to the same year.

4. By December 16, 198, in Busan and Gyeongnam-gun, the U.S. left approximately 0.03 grams of Meart Pail (hereinafter “Liopon”) who is a local mental medicine in the inside of the first car owned by the Defendant, with the highest level of 0.03g of Mepopon.

2. Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. - The Defendant administered approximately 0.03 gramopon in the Defendant’s house located in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si on April 16, 2017, in a caton to a coffee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A photograph of the increased number of vaccination;

1. Application of each request for appraisal-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 and Article 2 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Recommendations for the application of the sentencing criteria: No person that has been subject to special sentencing between October and two years (basic areas):

2. The Defendant, at the Changwon District Court on January 29, 2008, was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a crime under the Narcotics Control Act, and was sentenced to three times as well as a suspended sentence of three years for a crime under the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and was in response to the training of phiphones from the hair.

The fact that the defendant cooperates with the arrest of the criminal defendant for the sale of philophones is considered as favorable circumstances.

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the age, sex, environment, background, means and result of the instant case, and the circumstances after the crime.