2. The crime of this case was committed on July 15, 201 by the defendant, around 22:30 on his apartment corridor, and the victim D and E, who were living in the next house, were removed from the victim's apartment corridor, and thus, they wanted to bring the victims at a large interest on April 22, 2012, around 08:40, around October 1, 2012, around October 1, 2012, and around October 2, 2012, insulting each of the same victims with a large interest, and thus, rather than endeavoring to smoothly resolve the misunderstanding with the victims residing in the next house, the crime was not likely to be committed, and the circumstances of the defendant, including the victim's written use and efforts to recover damage, and the circumstances of the defendant's environment, the circumstances of the crime of this case, including the circumstances of this case, are unreasonable, making it difficult for the court below to have determined that the defendant's punishment of this case was unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.