If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 7, 2013, at around 23:40, the Defendant: (a) asked the Defendant to pay the drinking value on several occasions at the Guri Police Station D District E affiliated with the Guri Police Station D, which was called by the Defendant at “C” entertainment tavern located in Guri-si B, Gyeonggi-do, after having received a report that the Defendant would not pay the drinking value; (b) asked the Defendant “Is the Defendant to see that “Is the above E-E’s franch franch, franch, franch, franch, franch, and governance police, franch franch, franch,” and again requested the Defendant to present his identification card, “Is the Defendant’s desire to refuse to arrest the Defendant as a crime of fraud,” and (c) franch the franch franch franch of the E-E franch, thereby harming the E-mail back.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and the selection of fines

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.