2. The court below's reasoning is without merit, in full view of all matters concerning the records and arguments of this case, including the following facts: although the defendant was the first offender, the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and reflects them, the defendant acquired money from a large number of victims by the same method; the amount of damage reaches a total of KRW 660 million and caused serious damage to the victims; most of the damage amount is not recovered; the crime of forging private documents and uttering of falsified investigation documents for the crime of fraud was committed; there is no change of circumstances that may be particularly considered in the trial; the facts leading up to the crime of this case, the age, character and conduct of the defendant, circumstances after the crime, etc.; the punishment of the court below is determined to be appropriate; and the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, in the order column of the judgment below, "the rest of the application for compensation by the applicant for compensation is dismissed", and "1. The partial rejection of the application for compensation order: It is apparent that "the remainder other than the part cited in Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings" has been omitted by mistake. Thus, it is corrected that it is added ex officio in accordance with Article 25

.