If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

around 19:35 on March 10, 201, the Defendant, “2013 High 1857,” was under the influence of alcohol at Claundry, located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B.

Therefore, D, the owner of the above business, requested to assist the Incheon Southern Police Station E zone located in the vicinity, and F, the police officer belonging to the above district, demanded that the defendant who was sent to the scene along with a slope G and was satisfing the success, and returned home.

The Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the F police patrol of the F, a police officer, by spiting F, spiting F, spiting F, spiting F, spiting F’s spiting spits, spiting F’s spits.

At around 23:00 on April 23, 201, the Defendant, “2013 High-Family 1949, the Defendant, upon receiving a demand from H to pay KRW 5,800,00 to return from the taxi, a taxi operated by H, and then, the Defendant did not comply with such demand, she did not get off the taxi, she gets off the taxi, she did not get off the taxi, and she tried H to go to the district.

Accordingly, H called 112, and the defendant reported that he did not get off the taxi and did not get off the taxi, and therefore, H had the intention to report damage with a false content for the purpose of having the criminal punishment.

On April 23, 2011, at around 23:25, the Defendant reported that “A police officer on his name was assaulted by H, who is a taxi engineer,” and reported damage to the K District Office in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, the Defendant called that “A police officer, who is a taxi engineer, was able to see the Defendant’s right-hand knife with the Defendant’s right-hand knife at one time by hand,” and that “A police officer, who is a taxi engineer, was able to see the Defendant’s right-hand knife with the Defendant’s right-hand knife at one time.”

However, there is no fact that the defendant was a hand floor or a assault from H, and there is no fact that he was an injury that he was skeing.

Accordingly, the defendant did not admit H.

(i) the evidence;