2. The Defendants were involved in the instant crime by: (a) there is no criminal history; (b) Defendant C was the first offender with no criminal history; (c) there was no criminal record of the commission of the crime related to gambling; and (d) Defendants B did not directly open the Internet gambling site; and (c) Defendant B took advantage of the favorable circumstances for the Defendants, such as withdrawing the proceeds from the gambling site or depositing them into another person’s account; and (d) Defendant C actively contributed not only to performing the duties of maintaining and managing the gambling site, but also to concealing the proceeds of the gambling site’s operation; (b) Defendant C took part in the instant crime; (c) Defendant B received considerable allowances of KRW 3 million per month; and (d) Defendant C received benefits from the total period of the crime of gambling that the Defendants committed with the co-defendants of the lower court, by taking account of the fact that there was no direct opening of the Internet gambling site; and (c) Defendant C took advantage of social and economic harm from the total period of the crime of gambling to April 14, 2019.

3. Thus, the defendants' appeal is justified.