A. Indication of claims: It is as shown in the Attached Form “Cause of Claim”.

(b) Other omission of reasons for judgment: Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff’s claim and the Plaintiff’s claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor continue to remain effective as a ordinary co-litigation, since the Plaintiff filed an application for withdrawal after the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor’s participation in the lawsuit but did not obtain the consent of the Defendants who are the other party.

(2) The Plaintiff’s claim is based on the following facts: (a) the Plaintiff’s claim (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Da16729, Jul. 9, 2004); and (b) the Plaintiff’s claim was transferred to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff; and (c) the Plaintiff’s claim was dismissed.

In accordance with the purpose of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information, which was enforced on August 2014, the national interest in the protection of personal information, such as resident registration numbers, and the revised Personal Information Protection Act, shall not enter the resident registration numbers of the parties in the judgment of civil cases from January 1, 2015.

(excluding the case whose intention of registration or recording is ordered, or whose content is a partition of co-owned property)