요양비부지급처분취소
1. The Defendant’s disposition on February 25, 2013 against the Plaintiff’s reimbursement of the site for medical care expenses is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The plaintiff is an employee employed by the KNDDD Co., Ltd., and was diagnosed to escape from the open-end bus during a traffic accident on September 10, 2009, when he/she was getting out of the open-end bus used in the open-end bus, and was diagnosed to escape from the open-end signboard between the luxum, the luxal base, the luxal base, the luxal base, the luxal base, the 4-5 luxal base, and the 6-7 lu
B. On November 24, 2009, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on the ground that the above injury and disease constituted occupational accident. However, on December 9, 2009, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval for medical care on the ground that the Plaintiff’s commuting bus that the Plaintiff was on the time of the traffic accident did not provide for its employees, but provided for its partner companies, so it cannot be viewed as occupational accident because it was not under the control and management of the KCAB, and it is not subject to the control and management of the KCAB, and the escape certificate of the conical signboard between the fourth-5 and the fourth-7, and the escape certificate of the conical signboard at the time of the traffic accident, and thus, the causal relation with the traffic accident is not recognized.
C. On October 8, 2010, the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee dismissed the request for review on the ground that the Plaintiff’s request for review was made through a review by the Defendant, on the ground that the said traffic accident was caused while using a means of transport corresponding to the means of transport provided by the business owner, and that the disposition of non-approval of medical care on the climatic base, the climatic base, the climatic base, the climatic base, the climatic base, and the climatic base was revoked, and that the escape certificate of the 4-5-5-5-7-round the climatic signboard escape certificate was the climatic disease, and that the causal relation
On May 20, 201, according to the purport of the ruling on this review, the Defendant rendered a disposition of approval for medical care on the Plaintiff’s dominant salt, salkin salt, salkin salt, and salkin.
On November 30, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation seeking the revocation of the approval of the non-approval of the medical care for the escape from the upcoming signboard No. 4-5, and the escape from the upcoming No. 6-7, and No. 4.