부당이득금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is to add the following “2. Additional Judgment” to the assertion that the original defendant emphasizes or adds to the court of first instance, and cites it as it is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following changes.
The first half of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be changed to “assimil,” and the second half of the 4th 4th 5th 7th 1st 5th 5th 1st 5th 5th 5th 1st 5th 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th 1st 5th "(b)" shall be changed to “assimil, i.e., management service cost, and expense” of the management fee of 401, as follows.
B. The management organization under the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “Aggregate Buildings Act”) among the management expenses (401), even if there is no management organization regulations, etc. in force for the collection of management expenses, the management organization under the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “Aggregate Buildings Act”) may claim management expenses for common areas at least against the sectional owner, who is the person liable for such management expenses,
(See Supreme Court Decision 2012Da90740 Decided December 26, 2012. The management expenses for common areas include not only the expenses spent for the direct maintenance and management of the common areas of an aggregate building but also the expenses spent for the maintenance and management of the entire aggregate building including the section for exclusive use but also the expenses that need to be uniformly maintained and managed for the common interest of all occupants. If the expenses that need not be spent in advance are not clearly divided into the expenses used for the portion actually and specifically reverted to the individual interest of the occupants, it shall be deemed as including all the expenses so long as they are not clearly divided into the expenses that actually and specifically belong to the individual interest of the occupants
(See Supreme Court Decisions 2004Da3598, 3604 Decided June 29, 2006; 2007Da67227 Decided December 27, 2007, etc.). (2)