beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.24 2016나8765

계약금 등 반환

Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part which is dismissed or added under the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Article 420 of the dismissal or addition part of the judgment of the court of first instance

of this subsection, the following shall apply:

A. The Plaintiff is an urban development project zone (hereinafter referred to as “AH zone”) in the Goyang-dong-gu, Manyang-si.

) The AK Apartment located in the AI block and the AJ block (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) Of the following, each purchaser (excluding Plaintiff X) who purchased each unit of household units listed in the “number of units sold in lots” column of the attached sheet in the attached sheet, or the purchaser who acquired the status of the purchaser (Plaintiff X) with respect to the unit unit of household units in lots through resale of the right of sale shall be a person who acquired the status of the purchaser (Plaintiff X). “The contractor performing a new construction work” is a new construction work.

(A) The Seoul Central District Court 2012 Ma116 decided that "A Q was appointed as a trustee after the rehabilitation procedure was commenced and the bankruptcy procedure commenced by the Seoul Central District Court 2014Hahap63, and was declared bankrupt by the above court on April 16, 2014, and the supplementary intervenor of the defendant 1 and 2 was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy."

A. The lower court determined that “The Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising (hereinafter referred to as the “Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising”)” under Article 9 of the Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising (amended by Act No. 12096, Aug. 13, 2013; hereinafter referred to as the “Act on Fair Labeling and Advertising”).

every 13th page “Plaintiff A, B, E, F, G, and N,” written “Plaintiff F, N,” respectively.

W. 16. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 4.. 24. 1. 1. 1. 2. 1. 2. 1. 1. 1.

P. According to the statement No. 56 of the judgment on the cancellation of the instant sales contract based on the impossibility of performance, the Defendants’ claim No. 501, No. 501, 801, the household that the Plaintiff F purchased.