A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B’s fine of 3,00,000 won, Defendant C’s imprisonment of 10 months, and Defendant D.

Defendant

A is a person who has worked as the head of the M market Maintenance and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter referred to as the "Association") located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L from June 16, 2010 to February 21, 2014.

Defendant

B is a person who has worked as a director of the NConstruction Office in the construction design business.

Defendant

C is a person who has worked as a representative director of a listed corporation that runs a construction business or a housing construction business.

Defendant

D은 토목건축공사업, 포장공사업 등을 영위하는 P 주식회사에서 직원으로 근무하던 사람이다.

Defendant

E is a person who actually operates Q Q Co., Ltd. engaged in building work business, civil engineering work business, etc.

The above association formed on June 16, 2010 with 51 members, and promoted an urban environment improvement project in a site equivalent to 1,956 square meters in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government R1,956 square meters.

1. The selection and change of Defendant A’s contractor, designer, or appraisal business entity shall be promoted through the resolution of the general meeting of the partnership.

On December 27, 2011, the Defendant prepared a “Agreement on Joint Project for the Maintenance and Improvement of Market in Yeongdeungpo-gu L, Young-gu, which provides that “The Defendant shall cooperate with the representative director C in order to select theO as the contractor without a resolution of the general meeting,” in collusion with S, and promoted the tasks to selectO as the contractor.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with S as executive officers of the union, promoted the selection of the contractor at will without the resolution of the general meeting.

B. On June 27, 2013, the Defendant, in collusion with S, prepared a “M market improvement project agreement in Yeongdeungpo-gu L,” stating that “The P employee D and P shall cooperate with the contractor without a resolution of a general meeting,” and promoted the work to select P as the contractor.

As a result, the defendant in collusion with S as an officer of the partnership without a resolution of the general meeting.