추심금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited this case, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment of the plaintiff's additional argument in Paragraph (2) to the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable as it is by the main
The Defendant’s assertion that the instant reservation amount was set off by set off the claim for return of the instant reservation amount against the Defendant on an equal amount, and thus, the Defendant’s obligation to pay the instant reservation amount was extinguished as the Defendant deposited the same amount for several reasons such as attachment, etc., even though the Defendant kept only the expenses related to the two lawsuits filed by the Dasung Development (Korean Government District Court Decision 2011Gahap2804, 201Gahap10188, 10188).
Judgment
According to 17 February 17, 2012 201 Gohap10805 Attorney Fees 3,300,000 on May 7, 2012 201 Gohap10805 Attorney Fees 4,125,156,800 Gohap803 Attorney Fees 5,156,80444, 2013 or 1847 Attorney Fees 2013 or 1847 5, 2013 or 1847 5, 2013 or 184, 2013 or 184, 204, 2013 or 204, 205, 2013 or 204, 204, 204, 2013 or 186, 204, 2013, 205, 2014, 204, 2016