beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.01.17 2018나66852

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant and the incidental costs of appeal.

Reasons

1. The basic facts of the claim (1) on July 15, 2015, the Plaintiff (198 females) provided one child (2016) between the Plaintiff and Nonparty C (194 male) upon completion of the marriage report, and (2) the Defendant (1994 females) was at the time of school attendance at high school; (3) around January 2016, both C and the Defendant became aware of the contact point of C; and (4) from around January 2017, 201, it was known that C and the Defendant were their spouses, with the knowledge of the fact that C were their spouse, and (3) the Defendant was pregnant due to the sex relationship with C around February 16, 2017, and there was no further dispute between C and C, or there was no more evidence to acknowledge the relationship between C and C with the Plaintiff under the agreement between C and C, and (5) the Plaintiff was informed of the fact that C and C were subject to the agreement between C, and there was no more than 170 percent.7.7.

2. According to the above facts, the defendant is recognized to have committed a fraudulent act while maintaining an inappropriate relationship with C even though C is aware that it is a spouse.

This constitutes a tort that infringes on the right of the plaintiff, who is a spouse under the law of C and interferes with the maintenance thereof, which constitutes a tort that infringes on the plaintiff's right. Since it is obvious in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff suffered considerable mental suffering due to such tort, the defendant is obliged to compensate the plaintiff for mental suffering caused by the above tort.

(2) Unlike the above recognition, the Defendant stated that C was divorced from the Plaintiff at the time of the teaching system with C, thereby C.