If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. Around January 13, 2013, the Defendant ordered food meals to employees F at the “E” restaurant operated by the victim C in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, to pay the same food value.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay food values.

As above, the Defendant was provided with food equivalent to 12,50 won at the market price owned by the victim by F.

2. Around 10:40 on January 13, 2013, the Defendant ordered food food to the victim G in the “I” restaurant operated by the victim G located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, to pay the victim food value properly.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay food values.

The Defendant was provided with food equivalent to KRW 10,000 at the market price owned by the victim by the victim by making a false statement as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of each receipt statute;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;