On October 2013, 2013, the Defendant called “The head of labor division would give the head of a trade union a letter of loyalty, so it would be proper to work” (hereinafter “the horses of this case”) between the Hongcheon-gun bus bus bus riding room No. 8-9, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gu, Hongcheon-do, Hongcheon-gun, and the name of the said corporation C was unknown among the bus drivers.

However, there was no fact that the victim E, who is the chief of labor department, made a statement of loyalty to F, the chief of the labor union.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Maz.

1. Around June 2013, the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted the claim for wages against C, together with 23 employees including the Defendant, filed a lawsuit against C.

As a result, the Defendant had an interview with the former G around September of the same year, and only during that process, the horses of this case were made.

In other words, there is no fact that the honor of the victim is impaired as stated in the facts charged at the time and place indicated in the above facts charged.

2. Determination

A. First of all, the police of the victim and the statement in this court that correspond to the facts charged in this case were the victim's facts identical to the facts charged in D, and this constitutes a full statement and its admissibility is inadmissible.

B. In addition, witness H, I’s testimony, each fact confirmation and investigation report of H/I (the phone conversations with the outside J, K, L, and M) are limited to the fact that they had taken the voice of the Defendant from another person within the company, and it does not directly appeared at the time and place specified in the above facts charged. Thus, the facts charged in the instant case are supported.