If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who operates a sing club in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and E is a person who has worked as a sing club'sware, and F is a person who has worked as an entertainment club at the above sing club.

At around 03:00 on July 4, 2012, E, the Defendant’s employee, asked the customer G to “I may pay KRW 200,000 in cash.” The Defendant’s employee, “I may pay KRW 200,000 in cash.” He received the Agricultural Cash Card from G and withdrawn KRW 200,00,00, and had the Defendant F of entertainment reception reception reception reception with G at around 04:0 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Some statements made in the police interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning G;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion of a letter of self-statement in G production

1. E, who is an employee of the accused accused of the assertion, has not committed an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. by having F perform the sexual intercourse with G;

2. First, in full view of the following facts: (a) the credibility of the G’s investigative agency and legal statement, which are the core evidence of the instant case, is specific and consistent; (b) the witness E’s legal statement conforms to the G’s partial statement; and (c) there is no reason to make a false statement even when the G himself/herself is punished.

According to the above evidence, G’s statement in the court, etc. of the reliable witness G, as seen above, as to whether the instant singing club can sing out and singing out, after having singing out the singing club, and then coming to two vehicles within the meaning of so-called sexual traffic by having the Defendant’s employee E, sing out the cash through E, and around that time, G’s defect to be able to be E withdrawn cash.