However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 10, 2014, at around 04:20, the Defendant paid the taxi fare to the above police box as the issue of taxi engineer D and the taxi fare at the reinforcement police box located in Incheon, Incheon, the Defendant posted a complaint to the Eman, who is a police officer belonging to the above police box, stating that he was aware of only the horses of the above taxi engineer. The Defendant continued to take two times the head of the Defendant at the corner of the police box, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties for the situation, etc. inside the police box, such as threateninging the Defendant’s head at the front of the police box.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [Scope of the recommended sentence]: Imprisonment with prison labor for the basic sphere of the obstruction of performance of official duties (in the event of the obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of official duties) from 6 months to 1 year

2. Although the crime of this case, the sentence of this case is not good, the defendant is divided and reflected, the defendant has no particular criminal power in addition to the punishment of four times after 199, and other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, shall be determined as per the disposition.