2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 5, 2017, the Defendant is well aware of the victim’s “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, about January 5, 201, of the head of the field E and the president of the aggregate company at the construction site.

There are many copies of alleys construction work.

In the construction site, it is required to install a container in a framework company that allows the public to take meals to the public.

If you prepare food and deliver it to the container, there is a lot of profit.

To do so, it is necessary to provide food delivery rights to the first E site manager and the president of the aggregate company in the cost of rebates, so that the amount of KRW 60,000 is required.

‘False speech' was made.

However, in fact, the defendant did not know well the president of the company in charge of the E-site collection and the structural construction and thought to use the money to be received from the injured party for other personal purposes. Therefore, the victim did not have the intention or ability to deliver meals to the construction site that he performed at the field of e/Do.

On January 24, 2017, the Defendant deposited KRW 60 million into a financial account in the name of the mother of the Defendant on January 24, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant was given a delivery of KRW 60 million by deceiving the victim.

2. The fraud related to the right to operate a restaurant, which was located at the F construction site, is between the victim and the F Standing Director at the end of February 2017.

When the F is registered as F's collaborative company, it will be allowed to operate the restaurant in three F's construction sites around July to August 2017.

In addition, in the first half of 2018, 3 restaurants at the construction site of another F construction site will be referred to the F Executive Director.

In order to do so, 30 million won should be changed. If registered as a collaborative company later, 100 million won should be paid to the managing director separately.

‘Falsely false.’

However, the facts are that the defendant is not a F officer.