특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
The part of the judgment of the court below excluding the false accusation shall be reversed.
The defendant shall be sentenced to one year of imprisonment.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant 1) On April 2005, at first of all, the fact that the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (hereinafter "the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes") (Fraud) (hereinafter "the Aggravated Punishment Act"), the fraud around early October 2005 (the 150 million won fraud part), and the violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes Act (Fraud part) around December 2005 (the 1.0 billion won part) (the 1.0 billion won part) was provided as security at the time of receiving a loan from a financial institution under L, etc. (the 1.0 billion won part) is the land owned by the Defendant rather than L, and the judgment of the court below convicting the Defendant of this part of the facts charged without deceiving L in relation to the acquisition of real estate on free change of land or the lawsuit for noise of Suwon aircraft.
B) Around May 2005, the Defendant and L around May 2005 constitute a violation of the Specific Economic Crimes Act (Fraud) (Fraud part of KRW 750 million) against the Defendant and L around May 2005 (hereinafter “instant N Forest”).
3) The forest and field of land in two lots, including the instantO, shall be classified into “the forest and field of land” and “the forest and field of land.”
At the time of concluding a land sale and exchange contract with the contents of exchanging L, the possibility of winning the above N Forest in the appellate trial judgment of the court of first instance shall be examined, and the above N Forest shall be purchased at 5,00 square meters out of the above N Forest, and the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged shall be erroneous in misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles, even though the defendant did not deceiving L, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged shall be 889,749,492) of the violation of the Specific Economic Crimes Act (Fraud) of the Act on July 2006 of the Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) (the part of the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged shall not be erroneous in misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles.