beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.28 2016노4967

전자금융거래법위반

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won of a fine) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The instant crime is a crime that provides an unspecified number of unspecified persons with an important means to commit the so-called Bosing fraud. Considering that social harm caused by Bosing that the social harm caused by Bosing is very serious, it is necessary to strictly punish the act of transfer, acquisition, or mediation of the means of access, and the fact that the means of access transferred by the Defendant is actually used for the commission of fraud.

However, in full view of various sentencing conditions such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive for the crime, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, including the fact that the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake and reflects it, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.