beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2021.02.04 2020고단5781

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defamation and the Defendant, within the “D” restaurant operated by the Victim C (Ming, 60 years of age) in Gwangju-dong-gu around July 25, 2020, and among many customers, amongst the victims, “Chewing, Chewing,” and in the meantime, whether he/she “hing, cutting, and Chewing,” following:

Republic of Korea is one of the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea has investigated the back of a year, and the Republic of Korea is not a new one, but a new one.

The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, such as the expression “a large sound,” and insulting the victim.

2. Around July 26, 2020, the Defendant found the victim C (at around 09:0, 60 years of age) as a restaurant for the operation of the victim C (at around 09:0) as indicated in the preceding paragraph, and made a public insult of the victim, among the customers, etc., the Defendant used the victim as “Chewing, kniting, and kniting.”

3. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the E-wing and freight cars in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the injury) and the Road Traffic Act (or measures not taken after the accident).

On September 3, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on September 20, 2020, and led the G Kap in front of the G Kap in Gwangju Dong-gu, to go straight ahead of the G Kap in the direction of H hotel.

At the same time, the road was a narrow road of one lane. As such, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by driving the motor vehicle, such as driving on the front side and the right side, operating the steering gear properly according to the traffic situation, and preventing the occurrence of the traffic accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, due to occupational negligence, such as making a cell phone call, and failure to properly operate the steering gear, and the part of the victim I (Y 23 years old) who was standing on the right side of the road in the direction of the vehicle running by the Defendant at the time when he stops while driving the vehicle in J 7 years old, following the driver's seat in the driving of the vehicle by the Defendant.