A. The Plaintiff, from China to China, had a person who acquired the nationality of the Republic of Korea in around 1994 residing in Dong Dong Dongdong as the Defendant was living in the same Dong Dong Dongdong, and was under close relation with the Defendant’s children from around 2003, and was engaged in multiple monetary transactions, such as accepting investment in stocks to the Defendant.

B. From June 7, 2010 to May 24, 2011, a monetary transaction was conducted between the Plaintiff and the Defendant through a financial account as indicated in the following table.

원고가 피고의 계좌로 입금한 돈 피고가 원고의 계좌로 입금한 돈 일시 계좌 금액(원) 일시 계좌 금액(원) 2010. 6. 7. 메리츠증권 C 10,000,000 2010. 9. 1. 우리은행 D 1,000,000 2010. 9. 15. ~ 2011. 10. 24. 신한은행 E (명의자 F) 합계 3,900,000 2010. 9. 15. ~ 2010. 11. 16. 신한은행 G 합계 900,000 2010. 9. 15. ~ 2011. 6. 22. 신한은행 H 합계 4,000,000 2010. 9. 24. 우리은행 D 40,000 2010. 9. 28. 우리은행 D 500,000 2010. 10. 6. 우리은행 D 500,000 2010. 10. 25. 우리은행 D 100,000 2010. 12. 1. 우리은행 D 5,300,000 2010. 12. 2. 우리은행 I 4,670,000 2010. 12. 28. 우리은행 D 200,000 2011. 1. 19. 우리은행 D 10,000,000 2011. 2. 25. 대우증권 J 15,000,000 2011. 4. 11. 우리은행 D 200,000 2011. 4. 28. 메리츠증권 C 10,000,000 2011. 4. 28. 우리은행 D 200,000 2011. 4. 29. 대우증권 J 20,000,000 2011. 5. 23. 대우증권 J 17,000,000 2011. 5. 23. 메리츠증권 C 2,000,000 2011. 5. 24. 우리은행 D 200,000 합 계 78,670,000 합 계 27,040,000 [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제2호증의 1 내지 4, 제3호증의 1, 제4호증, 제5호증의 1, 3, 6, 제6호증의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지

2. As to the plaintiff's request

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is to receive tuition fees of KRW 50,000 per child from the Defendant, and the Defendant’s two children are to receive tuition fees of KRW 50,000 per child (for each child, two children) during the period from November 2003 to April 2012.