(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.23 2017고단743



A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.


Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2016, the Defendant reported to the civil petition office of the Seo-gu Police Station in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Jeju-si, Jeju-si, to the effect that “Around February 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported to the effect that “Around February 16, 2016, the Defendant was tightly occupying and resisting the other party (C) from his or her departure distance; and (b) attempted to make the instant departure (hereinafter “the instant departure”). However, the Defendant reported to the effect that “a request to punish the Defendant, because the Defendant was facing the right fingers on the door of the vehicle, to be punished.”

5. Around December 12, 200, a medical certificate issued by D’s department was submitted, and the medical certificate was written as “the instant injury” of the five parts of the right side of approximately two months from the date on which the two months occurred.

However, the Defendant suffered from the instant injury while he was in a axis around April 2014, and was completely cured with the Defendant’s medical treatment from the time of his death to December 2014. In the instant vision, there was no fact that C opened a door and did not cause any injury to the Defendant’s grandchildren or body.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on April 25, 2016, was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 2 million, which is a fine of KRW 3,00,000,00,000, in which he/she intends to get the driver’s seat from the vehicle in the instant vision, and filed a complaint against C, thereby having the Defendant criminal punishment. As such, the Defendant found the Defendant’s frame and the Defendant’s body D with the intent of having the Defendant be subject to criminal punishment, it means that the Defendant’s body was the instant vision that occurred in early 2016, and the Defendant, upon completion of the diagnosis written accordingly, presented C a written diagnosis to the investigative authority as if it were evidence of the damage as to the assertion of damage arising from the instant vision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the prosecution (including the cross-examination part with the defendant);

1. A chief executive officer and a medical certificate;

1. One copy of the medical care benefit record, one copy of the medical care record, and one health insurance summary record.