Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

On March 3, 2014, around 20:45, the Defendant: (a) sent to the victim F (n, 46) who is the spouse of Edocks Edocks in the Dong-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon by the invitation of the above church, and demanded compensation for the theft of the articles he had been on the wind; (b) taken the front side of the dangerous object in possession (12 cm in total, 2.5 cm in total, 28 cm in length); (c) taken out the F and the victim G (n, 52 cm in total), the victim H (n, 54 cm in total) and the victim I (54 cm in length).

As a result, the Defendant imposed the victim F on the victim F on the part of the treatment days to the victim F, on the part of the victim G, the victim G on the part of the fucker in the treatment days, on the part of the victim H, on the part of the bucker in the treatment days, and on the part of the victim I (the 54 years old), the part of the fucker in the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to I, H, F, G, J, and K;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, investigative reports, and certificates of medical records;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. It is against the reasoning of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons above, such as the means and result of the crime, although the crime has been committed with a contingent judgment, etc.